It came to light recently, during the run-up to the very recent national elections in Ireland that there is a real threat to the nation's historical and heroic opposition to abortion on demand. The threat to the unborn was not immediately detectable as it was buried in page 79 of the Labour Party's 92 page manifesto in a statement so clandestine in it's language, you'd be convinced that they were deliberately trying to cloud their policy description in the darkness of murky language that does not even mention abortion. This threat came to light when Irish Daily Mail corespondent Mary Ellen Synon's article in the Irish edition of the Daily Mail recently. The deceptive and shadowy means by which they are attempting to
gain a foot in the door of opening Ireland up to the scourge of abortion were in line with the grim and insidious nature of the operation itself. The set of words used did not even use the term abortion (itself a linguistic trick), for it reads "Labour in government will legislate in accordance with the Supreme Court judgment in the X Case, and the recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights". The X case is a special ruling in Ireland that allowed a woman to procure an abortion if she had been raped (confirmed by three doctors) and that the failure to procure such an abortion will result in her death. To allow Europe to pressurize Ireland to expand on this legislation would open a doorway to the hellish reality that abortion brings. And an abortuary really is hell on earth. I'm reminded of Clive Barkers' novella/film of Hellraiser wherein a man who is obsessed with the pain and pleasures of a demon box is literally torn to pieces by it's powers instantiated by a series of hooks. The demons who show up to re-assemble the pieces of flesh in order to identify the face of the victim, like some grim crime scene post-mortem are the "magnificent superbutchers" of Barkers imagination. That may sound absolutely horrible, but it's horror is dampened by the fact that it is only fiction. Well, after an abortion, the doctor has to re-assemble the limbs and sections of an aborted baby in order to ensure no part has been trapped inside the would-have-been mother's womb. That's way more gruesome because it's truly happens and otherwise rational, clear thinking human beings allow it.
200 heart beats per minute in fearful attempts to evade imminent death
ReplyDeleteWhile the idea of planned parenthood including abortion in the late 18th, 19th and early 20th century goes back to Thomas Malthus, Margaret Sanger and John D. Rockefeller III in their eugenic attempts to „advance“ mankind, we find todays most active and in fact violent defenders of the „right“ to end a childs life in womb of a pregnant woman among feminists. It is their last, i.e. ultimate resort to exert power over us, who accept the dignity of life at all stages.
It is usually criminal law, that deals with the details of terms, times and conditions (which are appallingly lax) to end a pregnancy and hence end a childs life. One has to be an emotionally extremely "hardened" character to actually be able to face let alone imagine, what a child whose mother has passed the death sentence - most often due to minor reasons e.g. the child as obstacle in her career - is living through in the last seconds of its vulnerable and absolutely innocent life.
It is safe to believe as first hand evidence has been provided by medical doctors practising abortion that the final moments of the end of a child, whose life is to be terminated inside the womb of its mother are governed by a state that we can only interpret as actual fear of an imminent, terribly violent death. At an increased heart rate of 200 beats per minute the child still attempts to evade the deadly tool of the medical doctor before it is torn into pieces.
Most so-called „emancipated“ women today defend their sole „right“ to sentence their unborn children to this violent death regardless of the opinion, will and right of the child´s father, which, taken heed of often could safe the childs life. Emancipated and pro-life fathers are seen in our misguided times as actively infringing womens rights and hence human rights.
However, the advancement of civilization will only progress once all members of our society are willing to accept that votes must not be held on human rights as the dignity of man is inviolable, i.e. inviolable at all stages in life.